On Sunday we looked at the story of the magi visiting Jesus. If you’ve not watched it yet you’ll find it here: https://youtu.be/SAK3JIoqss4
This is quite an unusual choice of passage for a Sunday before Christmas, but I wanted to look at it because of the potential link with our Daniel series.
The Bible is full of holes – just as every written account of anything is full of holes. You simply can’t write down everything about an event and nor would you want to. If you wrote down everything, the important things would get lost in the detail. So, the bits that were written down are important.
But the holes naturally invite us to try and fill them in. That’s what we do when we imagine ourselves into a Bible scene. It’s what film makers such as the Lumo Project do when they create films of the gospel accounts.
And there are all sorts of holes that have been filled in regarding the Christmas story. So much so that very few of us even realise that the things we think we know about Jesus’ birth are actually holes that have been filled in for us by the Victorians and nativity plays.
On Sunday I attempted to fill in a massive hole by suggesting that the magi came to Jerusalem because of their links to Daniel – who was himself one of the magi of Babylon. They’d heard his stories and read his prophesies that put a 490-year marker on the date when the Messiah would come. And so they were waiting and watching.
Of course, we don’t know that they actually came from Babylon or that they’d ever heard of Daniel. But I think it is more than likely that they did and they had.
I don’t think it’s possible to read the Bible without trying to fill in the holes. That’s one of the ways that stories work. It’s why people have an issue when their favourite book is turned into a film – because someone else’s version of events (even if they don’t change the plot line) is different to the pictures they’d created in their head.
So what things should we watch out for when we fill in the holes?
Our faith should be built on things that are actually there in the text and not on the holes. Nothing that I said on Sunday in terms of the impact the story has on our lives or what it shows us about Jesus was built on my speculation about the magi. The truths that Matthew wants to communicate remain true whether or not the magi had heard of Daniel. Our filling in of the holes should be consistent with the rest of the Bible.
The more we understand the Bible and the cultures within which it was written the better we will be at filling in the holes. If you’ve ever visited a museum or art gallery you’ve probably seen some massive paintings of scenes from the Bible by famous artists – where the characters look more like 17th Century Europeans than 1st Century Jews. In European art the magi are often portrayed as elaborately dressed formidable oriental kings. And maybe they were that. But as we saw on Sunday, for Matthew’s audience, they were also a bit of a joke and certainly a surprise. At one extreme they were a bunch of crooks who try and make up interpretations to dreams hoping that they’d come true eventually – and at the other they were a group of people in league with the forces of evil and opposed to God’s kingdom.
There’s lots more I could say, but one final encouragement. When we read the Bible and consciously (or subconsciously) fill in the holes we should read prayerfully, inviting God to speak to us through the Holy Spirit. Ask that the Holy Spirit will guide our imaginations as we visualise what we’re reading. Thank God that the Spirit who inspired Matthew to choose this story to be a part of his gospel is the same Spirit who speaks to us as we read about the magi two thousand years later.
